CivilsWisdom.
Updated · Today
Internal Security May 08, 2026 5 min read Daily brief · #3 of 33

Operation Sindoor showcased India’s ability to compel its adversary to surrender: Rajnath Singh

One year after Operation Sindoor, senior defence officials have characterised the operation as a demonstration of India's ability to compel an adversary — a ...


What Happened

  • One year after Operation Sindoor, senior defence officials have characterised the operation as a demonstration of India's ability to compel an adversary — a significant doctrinal shift from deterrence (preventing attack) to compellence (forcing a change in behaviour).
  • Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, 2025, struck nine terror infrastructure targets across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir in a tri-service precision campaign lasting approximately 88 hours.
  • Official statements framed the operation as reflecting a "whole-of-government approach" integrating military action, diplomatic outreach, and economic signalling simultaneously.
  • India dispatched seven all-party parliamentary delegations to 33 countries to build diplomatic legitimacy for the operation's framing as a counter-terrorism action.
  • The Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 was placed in abeyance as part of the broader coercive package, signalling India's willingness to deploy non-military instruments of statecraft.

Static Topic Bridges

Compellence vs. Deterrence: Strategic Theory

In strategic studies, deterrence aims to prevent an adversary from taking an action by threatening unacceptable costs. Compellence, a term developed by American strategist Thomas Schelling in his 1966 work Arms and Influence, refers to the use of threatened or actual force to make an adversary stop doing something or actively change its behaviour. Deterrence is passive; compellence is active. India's post-Kargil posture has generally been characterised as deterrence — demonstrating capability to raise the cost of Pakistani support for cross-border terrorism without actually imposing those costs. Operation Sindoor represents a shift: actual military strikes designed to alter Pakistani behaviour, not merely threaten future costs. This doctrinal evolution is sometimes called the PRAHAAR Doctrine by analysts, emphasising proactive cost imposition over passive deterrence.

  • Thomas Schelling's distinction between deterrence and compellence is central to GS Paper 3 (Security Studies).
  • Operation Parakram (2001–02), India's earlier coercive mobilisation after the Parliament attack, is considered a failed compellence attempt — it mobilised forces but did not translate the threat into behavioural change.
  • The Cold Start Doctrine (developed post-2001) sought to restore credibility of conventional compellence by enabling swift offensive operations without full mobilisation, staying below Pakistan's nuclear threshold.
  • Operation Sindoor is the first instance since 1971 where India used conventional military force to strike targets inside Pakistan proper.

Connection to this news: The post-operation framing by senior officials explicitly invoked the language of compellence, marking a formal acknowledgement of a doctrinal shift that UPSC will likely test through questions on India's evolving security doctrine.


Cold Start Doctrine and Escalation Management

The Cold Start Doctrine (CSD), sometimes referred to as the "Pro-Active Strategy," was developed by the Indian Army in the early 2000s in response to the perceived failure of Operation Parakram's slow mobilisation. The doctrine envisages Integrated Battle Groups (IBGs) — smaller, combined-arms formations that can launch rapid, limited offensive operations within 48–96 hours of an order, aiming for shallow territorial gains. The objective is to impose military costs on Pakistan below the threshold that would trigger nuclear escalation. Operation Sindoor differed from Cold Start in being an air-centric precision strike operation rather than a ground offensive, but shared the same core logic: maintaining conventional military pressure without triggering nuclear escalation.

  • India's Army Chief formally acknowledged the existence of a "pro-active strategy" in 2017, though the name "Cold Start" was avoided officially for years.
  • Pakistan responded to CSD by developing tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs), including the Nasr (Hatf-IX) short-range ballistic missile, to lower the nuclear threshold.
  • Integrated Battle Groups (IBGs) are the operational units designed for Cold Start; their creation was part of the Indian Army's Restructuring of Army Divisional System.

Connection to this news: Operation Sindoor's success in conducting precision strikes while managing escalation — halting after achieving defined objectives and accepting a ceasefire — demonstrates that India's armed forces have developed practical escalation management protocols, a key concern in Cold Start critiques.


Integrated Deterrence: Combining Military, Diplomatic, and Economic Instruments

Integrated deterrence is a concept from modern strategic studies that emphasises combining military capability with diplomatic, economic, informational, and legal instruments into a coherent coercive framework. India's response to the 2025 Pahalgam attack drew on all these dimensions: precision military strikes (military), all-party diplomatic delegations to 33 countries (diplomatic), suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (economic/resource), and a coherent public information strategy (informational). This multi-domain approach is distinct from single-instrument coercion and is increasingly referenced in India's defence policy discourse.

  • The Indus Waters Treaty (1960), signed by India and Pakistan with World Bank as broker, has survived four India-Pakistan wars — its suspension in 2025 marked an unprecedented step.
  • The treaty divides six rivers: India controls the three Eastern Rivers (Beas, Ravi, Sutlej); Pakistan controls the three Western Rivers (Indus, Chenab, Jhelum).
  • India formally held the treaty in abeyance in April 2025, linking resumption to Pakistan ending support for cross-border terrorism.

Connection to this news: The articulation of Operation Sindoor as a "whole-of-government approach" directly maps onto the integrated deterrence framework, making this a high-value analytical topic for Mains GS Paper 3 and Essay.

Key Facts & Data

  • Operation Sindoor launched: night of May 6–7, 2025; duration approximately 88 hours.
  • Nine terror infrastructure targets struck, including facilities linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and Hizbul Mujahideen.
  • Pahalgam terror attack: April 22, 2025; 26 civilians killed.
  • Ceasefire effective: May 10, 2025, 5:00 PM IST.
  • Seven all-party parliamentary delegations dispatched to 33 countries for diplomatic outreach.
  • Indus Waters Treaty (1960): signed September 19, 1960, by Jawaharlal Nehru and Ayub Khan; brokered by the World Bank; placed in abeyance April 2025.
  • Thomas Schelling, Arms and Influence (1966): foundational text for compellence theory.
  • Operation Parakram (2001–02): India's earlier coercive mobilisation after Parliament attack — did not achieve compellence objectives.
On this page
  1. What Happened
  2. Static Topic Bridges
  3. Compellence vs. Deterrence: Strategic Theory
  4. Cold Start Doctrine and Escalation Management
  5. Integrated Deterrence: Combining Military, Diplomatic, and Economic Instruments
  6. Key Facts & Data
Display