Current Affairs Topics Quiz Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

Mass suspensions, mics switched off: Opposition talking points in debate on resolution to remove Speaker

March 10, 2026 4 min read Polity & Governance GS Paper 2 (Polity Parliament Constitutional Provisions)
On This Page ▼

What Happened

  • During the Lok Sabha debate on the resolution to remove Speaker Om Birla, Opposition MPs raised two additional issues beyond partisan conduct: the 12-year vacancy in the Deputy Speaker's office and the pattern of mass suspensions and switched-off microphones
  • Opposition members argued that failure to elect a Deputy Speaker since 2014 constitutes a constitutional violation — Article 93 uses "shall", making the election of both Speaker and Deputy Speaker obligatory, not discretionary
  • MPs pointed to multiple instances of entire Opposition benches being suspended from House proceedings and microphones being switched off during speeches, particularly for the Leader of Opposition
  • The government defended the Speaker's actions as necessary to maintain order, arguing that disruption of proceedings — not suppression — was being addressed

Static Topic Bridges

Article 93: The Constitutional Obligation to Elect a Deputy Speaker

Article 93 of the Constitution mandates the election of both a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker as soon as practicable after the constitution of a new Lok Sabha. The use of "shall" in the provision has generated a significant constitutional debate on whether the long vacancy is a violation.

  • Article 93 text: "The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof" — the mandatory language "shall" and "as soon as may be" are constitutionally significant
  • Functions of Deputy Speaker: Presides over the House in the Speaker's absence; sits as Chair of the Committee of the Whole House; can head certain Parliamentary Standing Committees; performs Speaker's functions when the Speaker is absent or the office is vacant
  • Convention: By parliamentary convention in India (though not constitutionally mandated), the Deputy Speaker position has historically gone to the principal Opposition party — ensuring a degree of bipartisan balance in House leadership
  • Vacancy since 2014: The 16th Lok Sabha (2014-2019) and 17th Lok Sabha (2019-2024) both ended without electing a Deputy Speaker — an unprecedented constitutional omission spanning over a decade
  • No enforcement mechanism: The Constitution provides no penalty or enforcement tool if the House fails to elect a Deputy Speaker — it creates an obligation but no sanction for breach

Connection to this news: The Opposition's argument during the Speaker removal debate highlighted that the same House majority responsible for the Speaker's alleged partisan conduct had also withheld the Deputy Speaker position — a dual constitutional violation that together undermines balance in House leadership.

Mass Suspensions and Parliamentary Privilege

The Speaker's power to suspend members is a necessary tool for maintaining order, but its application raises questions about proportionality and the rights of elected representatives.

  • Rule 373 (Rules of Procedure, Lok Sabha): Speaker can name a member who is guilty of disorderly conduct; the House can then suspend the named member for the remainder of the session
  • Rule 374A: Automatic suspension for 5 days for a member who persistently and wilfully obstructs proceedings — introduced in 2001
  • Parliamentary privilege: Members have absolute immunity from legal proceedings for anything said in the House (Article 105(2)); but the House itself can discipline members through suspension
  • Mass suspension controversy: In recent sessions (2023-2024), over 140 Opposition MPs were suspended in a single session — an unprecedented number that the Opposition argued amounted to "legislative emergency" — stripping the House of its deliberative character
  • No judicial review: Courts have historically declined to interfere with internal parliamentary proceedings (Article 212 — courts cannot inquire into validity of proceedings in Parliament on grounds of procedural irregularity); however, extreme cases may engage Article 32/226

Connection to this news: The Opposition's case against the Speaker linked mass suspensions to the removal motion — arguing that selective use of suspension powers to silence Opposition voices violated the fundamental principle that a legislature must have a functioning Opposition to check executive power.

Key Facts & Data

  • Article 93: Uses "shall" — mandatory obligation to elect both Speaker and Deputy Speaker
  • Deputy Speaker position vacant since: 2014 — over 12 years by the time of this debate (March 2026)
  • Historical convention: Deputy Speaker post given to principal Opposition party
  • Rule 373: Speaker can name disorderly member for suspension by House resolution
  • Rule 374A: Automatic 5-day suspension for persistent obstruction — introduced 2001
  • Article 212: Courts cannot inquire into parliamentary proceedings on grounds of procedural irregularity
  • Over 140 MPs suspended in the 2023 Winter Session — a historical record
  • Deputy Speaker's key function: Presides when Speaker is absent; Chairs Committee of the Whole House