Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

‘Right-sizing’ federalism: Tamil Nadu panel headed by Justice Kurian Joseph calls for changes in language policy, Governor post

February 19, 2026 7 min read Polity & Governance GS2 (Polity & Governance Federalism Centre-State Relations)
On This Page ▼

What Happened

  • A high-level committee chaired by retired Supreme Court Justice Kurian Joseph has submitted a comprehensive report to the Tamil Nadu Government recommending a "structural reset" in India's federal framework
  • The committee was constituted in April 2025 by the Tamil Nadu Government to examine principles of state autonomy and Union-State relations; other members include retired IAS officer M. Ashok Vardhan Shetty and former TN State Planning Commission Vice-Chairman Professor M. Naganathan
  • Key recommendations include: fixed 5-year tenure for Governors with appointment based on state assembly recommendation, making English a permanent link language, and requiring the Union to bear at least 80% of costs for Centrally Sponsored Schemes
  • The panel recommended amendments to Articles 343, 345, and 346 on language policy, and proposed mandatory 15-day timelines for Governors to act on state bills
  • Tamil Nadu CM M.K. Stalin has called for a constitutional amendment based on the panel's recommendations

Static Topic Bridges

Governor Under the Indian Constitution — Appointment, Role, and Controversies (Articles 153-167)

The Governor is the constitutional head of a state, appointed by the President under Article 155 and holding office "during the pleasure of the President" under Article 156(1), with a normal term of five years (Article 156(3)). The Governor's discretionary powers, particularly regarding bill assent (Article 200), reservation of bills for Presidential consideration (Article 201), and role in government formation, have been a persistent source of Centre-State friction.

  • Article 153: There shall be a Governor for each State (one person may be Governor of two or more states — 7th Amendment, 1956)
  • Article 155: Governor appointed by the President (in practice, by the Central Government)
  • Article 156: Holds office during the pleasure of the President — no security of tenure; can be removed at any time without cause
  • Article 200: Governor may assent, withhold assent, or reserve a bill for the President; no time limit specified in the Constitution for acting on bills
  • Article 201: When a bill is reserved, the President may assent, withhold assent, or return it for reconsideration
  • Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974): Governor must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers except in matters where discretion is expressly granted
  • Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker (2016): The Supreme Court held that the Governor cannot act as "an agent of the Centre"

Connection to this news: The panel's recommendation for a fixed, non-renewable 5-year tenure with appointment from a panel approved by the state assembly directly addresses the "pleasure doctrine" under Article 156, which currently allows the Centre to remove Governors at will — a power frequently criticized as being used for political purposes.

Sarkaria Commission (1988) and Punchhi Commission (2010) — Federal Reform Recommendations

Two major commissions have previously examined Centre-State relations. The Sarkaria Commission (set up 1983, reported 1988, chaired by Justice R.S. Sarkaria) made 247 recommendations. The Punchhi Commission (set up 2007, reported 2010, chaired by former CJI M.M. Punchhi) updated these recommendations for contemporary challenges including globalisation and coalition politics.

  • Sarkaria Commission on Governors: Governor should be an eminent person from outside the state, not belonging to the ruling party; should not be removed before completing 5-year term except in "rare and compelling" circumstances; should be selected in consultation with the state CM
  • Punchhi Commission on Governors: Recommended that the Governor be selected by a committee comprising the PM, Home Minister, Vice President, Speaker, and the concerned state CM; proposed a fixed 5-year tenure with removal only through a process akin to impeachment; recommended that Governors must dispose of bills within 6 months
  • Sarkaria on Article 356: Should be used as a last resort; prior warning should be given to state government
  • Punchhi on Article 356: Recommended amending Article 356 to make its use justiciable and subject to a Constitutional Bench review
  • Inter-State Council: Sarkaria recommended making it a permanent body (constituted in 1990 under Article 263); Punchhi recommended regular meetings and strengthened secretariat

Connection to this news: The Kurian Joseph Committee's recommendations closely mirror and build upon the Sarkaria and Punchhi Commissions' suggestions, particularly on fixed Governor tenure and appointment process, adding the novel proposal of state assembly approval and a mandatory 15-day timeline for action on bills.

Official Language Provisions — Articles 343-351 (Part XVII of the Constitution)

Part XVII of the Constitution deals with language policy. Article 343 declares Hindi in Devanagari script as the official language of the Union, with English to continue for 15 years from the commencement of the Constitution (i.e., until 1965). The Official Languages Act, 1963 (amended 1967) extended the use of English indefinitely alongside Hindi for official Union purposes. The Three-Language Formula (first proposed by the Kothari Commission, 1964-66) has been the basis of language education policy.

  • Article 343(1): Hindi in Devanagari script shall be the official language of the Union
  • Article 343(2): English to continue for 15 years from 1950 for official purposes of the Union
  • Article 343(3): Parliament may by law provide for continued use of English beyond 15 years — basis for Official Languages Act, 1963
  • Article 345: State legislature may adopt one or more regional languages or Hindi as official language(s) of that state
  • Article 346: Language for communication between states and between states and Union — authorised language of the Union or English (until Parliament provides otherwise)
  • Article 351: Duty of the Union to promote the spread of Hindi
  • Eighth Schedule: Currently lists 22 languages (expanded from 14 original languages; last additions in 2003 — Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali via 92nd Amendment)
  • Tamil Nadu never adopted the Three-Language Formula and follows a two-language policy (Tamil and English)

Connection to this news: The panel recommends amending Articles 343, 345, and 346 to make English the permanent official link language and abandon the "One Nation, One Language" approach. This reflects Tamil Nadu's historic opposition to Hindi imposition, dating to the 1965 anti-Hindi agitation that shaped the state's language politics.

Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) and Fiscal Federalism

Centrally Sponsored Schemes are central government programmes implemented by states with shared funding. The CSS framework has been a contentious aspect of fiscal federalism, as states bear significant implementation costs while the Centre controls design and conditionalities. The panel's recommendation that the Union bear at least 80% of CSS costs represents a significant shift from current patterns.

  • CSS are distinct from Central Sector Schemes (100% centrally funded) — CSS require state matching contributions, typically in 60:40, 75:25, or 90:10 ratios (for NE and hill states)
  • After the 14th Finance Commission (2015), states' share of central taxes was increased from 32% to 42%, but many new CSS were introduced with higher state contributions
  • 15th Finance Commission (chaired by N.K. Singh, 2021-26): Recommended 41% devolution to states (reduced from 42% due to J&K reorganisation); recommended rationalising CSS
  • GST Council (Article 279A): Decisions by one-half of total votes weighted; Centre has one-third voting weight, states collectively two-thirds — but Centre can influence outcomes
  • Health and education are State List subjects (List II, Seventh Schedule) — Central intrusion via CSS has been criticised as "conditional transfers" that undermine state autonomy

Connection to this news: The panel's demand for 80% Central funding and "flexible untied grants" challenges the current CSS model where Central conditionalities often compel states to divert their own resources to centrally designed schemes, even in core state domains like health and education.

Key Facts & Data

  • Committee: Chaired by Justice Kurian Joseph (retired SC judge); constituted April 2025 by Tamil Nadu Government
  • Members: M. Ashok Vardhan Shetty (retired IAS), Prof. M. Naganathan (former TN Planning Commission Vice-Chairman)
  • Governor reforms: Fixed 5-year non-renewable tenure; appointment from a panel of 3 names approved by state assembly; 15-day mandatory timeline for acting on bills
  • Language reforms: Amend Articles 343, 345, 346 — make English permanent link language
  • Fiscal reforms: Union to bear at least 80% of CSS costs; flexible untied grants to states
  • GST Council: Reform voting and quorum rules to prevent unilateral central decisions
  • Constitutional amendments: Require binding two-thirds majority with state ratification for changes affecting specific states
  • Key precedents: Sarkaria Commission (1988, 247 recommendations), Punchhi Commission (2010, 7 volumes)