Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

India condemns Pakistan air strikes against Afghanistan: ‘Kabul’s sovereignty must be respected’


What Happened

  • India's Ministry of External Affairs condemned Pakistan's air strikes on Afghan territory, calling them "yet another act of aggression by a Pakistani establishment that remains hostile to the idea of a sovereign Afghanistan."
  • Pakistan carried out air strikes in Kabul and provinces of eastern Afghanistan (Nangarhar, Paktika, and Khost) targeting alleged Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) camps, killing at least 16 civilians and injuring 15 others.
  • MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated that Afghanistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity must be fully respected, and condemned the destruction of civilian infrastructure.
  • India had already condemned Pakistan's cross-border military operations at the UN Security Council on March 9, 2026, accusing Pakistan of "duplicity" in its approach to terrorism.
  • Pakistan framed the strikes as counter-terrorism operations (Operation Ghazab lil-Haq / "Righteous Fury") targeting TTP sanctuaries it claims are harboured by Afghanistan's Taliban-led government.

Static Topic Bridges

The Durand Line: Colonial Border and Source of Enduring Conflict

The Durand Line is the 2,640 km (1,640-mile) border between Pakistan and Afghanistan, drawn in 1893 by British colonial administrator Sir Mortimer Durand during negotiations with Afghan Amir Abdur Rahman Khan. No Afghan government — including the current Taliban administration — has formally recognised the Durand Line as an international boundary.

  • The line divides the Pashtun ethnic population between Afghanistan and Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) and Balochistan provinces.
  • Afghanistan's argument: the 1893 agreement was an imposed colonial demarcation valid only for the British Indian period; Pakistan inherited a border that was never legitimately agreed upon.
  • Pakistan fenced portions of the Durand Line with a border management system starting 2017; Afghanistan and the Taliban have repeatedly protested this.
  • The TTP's cross-border sanctuary in Afghanistan is partly enabled by the Pashtun ethno-cultural continuum across the line — TTP fighters are ethnically and tribally linked to communities on both sides.

Connection to this news: Pakistan's air strikes are directly tied to its inability to enforce the Durand Line — it cannot prevent TTP movement across a border Afghanistan doesn't recognise, and the Taliban government refuses to crack down on TTP due to ideological and ethnic solidarity.

Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP): Origins, Ideology, and Cross-Border Dimension

The TTP (Pakistani Taliban) was founded in 2007 under Baitullah Mehsud as a loose confederation of militant groups committed to overthrowing Pakistan's government and imposing its version of Islamic law. The TTP has carried out thousands of attacks inside Pakistan, including the 2014 APS Peshawar attack (132 schoolchildren killed). After the Afghan Taliban's takeover in August 2021, the TTP relocated much of its command structure to eastern Afghanistan.

  • TTP is designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation by the US and a banned terrorist organisation in Pakistan and the UN.
  • TTP is distinct from the Afghan Taliban but shares ideological roots, personnel, and sanctuaries.
  • TTP attacks in Pakistan surged after August 2021: over 1,000 attacks in 2023-24 alone (data: Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies).
  • Pakistan blames Afghan Taliban for providing TTP with sanctuary; Afghan Taliban denies harbouring TTP but refuses to extradite TTP leaders.
  • In October 2025, Pakistan struck a TTP target in Kabul, triggering an escalation cycle that led to the current open hostilities.

Connection to this news: Pakistan frames the March 2026 air strikes as self-defence against a TTP safe haven — but India's condemnation highlights that using air strikes against civilian populations in a sovereign country to address terrorism is a violation of international law and norms.

India's Strategic Interest in a Stable Afghanistan

India's Afghanistan policy is driven by several converging interests: preventing Pakistani strategic depth in Kabul, maintaining access to Central Asia via the INSTC/Chabahar route, limiting the spread of radicalisation into Jammu & Kashmir, and economic engagement with Afghan resources and markets.

  • India invested approximately $3 billion in Afghanistan between 2001-2021, building the Salma Dam (Afghan-India Friendship Dam), the Afghan Parliament building in Kabul, and a road from Zaranj to Delaram (218 km) connecting Afghanistan to the Iranian border.
  • India's Taliban engagement: After initial reluctance, India reopened its embassy in Kabul in June 2022 and a consulate in Kandahar — a pragmatic diplomatic recognition of the Taliban's control.
  • India's concern: Pakistan seeks "strategic depth" in Afghanistan — a compliant government in Kabul that would not allow India's influence or provide India a western flank in the event of India-Pakistan conflict.
  • India-Taliban: India has provided humanitarian aid (wheat, medicine) to Afghanistan under Taliban rule, maintaining goodwill without formal recognition.

Connection to this news: India's vocal condemnation of Pakistan's air strikes is consistent with its long-standing policy of opposing Pakistani military aggression in the region — but it also reflects India's growing engagement with the Taliban government as a pragmatic partner, and its interest in preventing further destabilisation on Pakistan's western front.

Pakistan-Afghanistan Relations: Breakdown of a Complex Partnership

Pakistan was instrumental in creating the Taliban in the 1990s through the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and backed its return to power in 2021. However, the relationship deteriorated rapidly after August 2021 as the Afghan Taliban declined to crack down on the TTP and border tensions escalated. By early 2026, the two countries were in a state of near-open war.

  • Pakistan's Operation Ghazab lil-Haq (February-March 2026): named "Righteous Fury," targeting alleged TTP camps in Nangarhar, Paktika, Khost, and Kabul.
  • Afghan Taliban's response: condemned the strikes as "unprovoked aggression," launched counter-attacks against Pakistani border posts.
  • Afghanistan does not recognise TTP as a terrorist organisation; the Afghan Taliban and TTP share a common ideological framework (Deobandi Islam, Pashtun nationalism).
  • Civilian casualties from Pakistani strikes reported: at least 16 killed, 15 injured (March 14 attack alone).

Connection to this news: India condemned the strikes not only on sovereignty grounds but also noting civilian casualties — aligning India's position with international humanitarian law standards and distinguishing India's approach from Pakistan's framing of the strikes as legitimate counter-terrorism.

Key Facts & Data

  • Pakistan's air strikes targeted: Kabul, Nangarhar, Paktika, Khost provinces of Afghanistan.
  • Casualties reported: at least 16 civilians killed, 15 injured.
  • India condemned at UNSC on March 9 and MEA again on March 14, 2026.
  • India's characterisation: "yet another act of aggression by a Pakistani establishment hostile to a sovereign Afghanistan."
  • TTP founded: 2007; designated Foreign Terrorist Organisation by the US.
  • Durand Line: 2,640 km, drawn 1893 by Sir Mortimer Durand; not recognised by any Afghan government.
  • Pakistan's operation name: Operation Ghazab lil-Haq (Righteous Fury).
  • India's investment in Afghanistan (2001-2021): ~$3 billion.
  • India reopened Kabul embassy: June 2022.