Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

‘We are attacking US bases, not neighbours; India-Iran relations deep’: Abdul Majid Hakim Elahi, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei’s representative in India


What Happened

  • Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made a carefully worded statement distinguishing Iran's military campaign from attacks on neighbouring states: "We have not attacked our neighbours. We have not attacked Muslim countries. We have attacked American targets and American bases, which are unfortunately located in the soil of our neighbours."
  • Araghchi directly reached out to India's External Affairs Minister Jaishankar to reassure him: "We are not targeting you" — a reference to the millions of Indians living in Gulf countries hosting US bases.
  • The Iranian statement was calibrated to prevent Gulf states (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain) from formally aligning with the US-Israel side, and to keep India from distancing itself from Tehran.
  • Iran described its bilateral relationship with India as "deep and civilisational," pointing to Chabahar Port, shared Persian-Indic cultural heritage, and centuries of trade as foundations of the relationship.
  • The statement came as India was simultaneously hosting IRIS Lavan (an Iranian warship) in Kochi and fielding pressure from the US to take a clearer stance against Iran.

Static Topic Bridges

India-Iran Bilateral Relations: Strategic and Economic Dimensions

India and Iran share a relationship that predates modern nation-states — rooted in Persian cultural influence on India (Urdu, Mughal architecture, shared literary tradition) and geographic proximity. In the modern era, the relationship has been shaped by: energy trade (Iran was India's second-largest oil supplier before sanctions), Chabahar Port (India's strategic connectivity project), the North-South Transport Corridor, and India's interest in accessing Central Asia via Iran. Despite US pressure, India has maintained civilian engagement with Iran including the Chabahar Port partnership.

  • India-Iran Chabahar Port Agreement: 10-year contract signed May 2024; India operates Shahid Beheshti terminal via IPGL (India Ports Global Limited).
  • Chabahar is Iran's only deepwater port on the Gulf of Oman; it gives India a route to Afghanistan and Central Asia bypassing Pakistan.
  • North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC): planned multimodal route linking India (via Iran and Russia) to Europe; Chabahar is the southern anchor.
  • India-Iran bilateral trade was ~$17 billion in FY 2018-19 (before US re-imposed sanctions); fell to ~$2 billion by 2022-23.
  • India imported ~23 million tonnes/year of Iranian crude before 2019 sanctions; halted after US pressure.
  • Chabahar received a US sanctions exemption in May 2024 — one of the few Iran-linked projects to get such a waiver.

Connection to this news: Araghchi's assurance to Jaishankar reflects Iran's awareness of India's strategic value as a non-aligned power — and Iran's interest in keeping Chabahar operational and India-Iran ties intact even during the conflict.

Doctrine of Proportionality and International Humanitarian Law

Iran's stated targeting doctrine — focusing on US military assets rather than civilian infrastructure in neighbouring states — invokes the customary international law principle of distinction (between military and civilian targets) and proportionality (attacks must not cause civilian harm disproportionate to military advantage). These principles are codified in the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols (1977). However, Iran's drone and missile attacks on Gulf infrastructure (including Dubai airport fuel tanks) blurred the distinction between military and civilian targets.

  • Geneva Conventions (1949) + Additional Protocols (1977): cornerstone of International Humanitarian Law (IHL).
  • Principle of Distinction (AP I, Article 48): parties must distinguish combatants from civilians and military from civilian objects.
  • Principle of Proportionality (AP I, Article 51): prohibits attacks expected to cause civilian harm disproportionate to military advantage.
  • Dual-use infrastructure (airports, ports, energy facilities): occupies a grey zone in IHL — can be argued as either civilian or military.
  • Iran's Araghchi claim: "US bases are military targets; their location within allied countries does not make them civilian."
  • This argument is controversial under IHL, since strikes on co-located facilities inevitably risk allied-nation civilian harm.

Connection to this news: Iran's legal-diplomatic framing ("we target US bases, not neighbours") is designed to retain the moral and legal high ground — and is directly relevant to UPSC International Law and IR questions on the limits of self-defence and proportionality.

India's Position in West Asian Conflicts: Historical Pattern

India has historically maintained a careful balance in West Asian conflicts — combining principled positions (support for Palestinian statehood, advocacy for ceasefire, non-interference in internal affairs) with pragmatic engagement (trade with Iran, defence cooperation with Israel, energy imports from Saudi Arabia, investment from UAE). This balance has occasionally required India to absorb contradictions — for instance, deepening ties with Israel post-1992 while maintaining formal support for Palestine at the UN.

  • India recognised Palestine in 1988; supports a two-state solution.
  • India-Israel full diplomatic relations established: January 1992.
  • India-Israel bilateral trade: ~$10 billion in 2023-24; defence cooperation: India is one of Israel's largest defence customers.
  • India abstained on UNGA resolutions calling for ceasefire in Gaza (Oct 2023) — a departure from historical practice.
  • India's 2026 position on the Iran war: called for de-escalation and dialogue; abstained on UNSC votes (which were paralysed by P5 divisions anyway).
  • India's EAM Jaishankar called for ceasefire publicly, was praised by Finland's Stubb as evidence of India's peacemaking potential.

Connection to this news: Iran's direct outreach to India — and India's response of hosting an Iranian warship while calling for ceasefire — is entirely consistent with India's historical pattern of maintaining ties with all parties in West Asian conflicts while formally supporting peace.

Key Facts & Data

  • Iran's FM Araghchi stated: "We are not targeting you" (directly to India's Jaishankar)
  • India-Iran Chabahar 10-year agreement: signed May 2024; IPGL operates Shahid Beheshti terminal
  • India-Iran trade: ~$17 billion (FY 2018-19, pre-sanctions); fell to ~$2 billion post-2019 sanctions
  • Chabahar US sanctions exemption: granted May 2024 (one of very few Iran-linked exemptions)
  • India recognised Palestine: 1988; India-Israel full diplomatic relations: January 1992
  • Geneva Conventions (1949) Additional Protocol I (1977): codifies distinction and proportionality in warfare
  • Indian diaspora in Gulf (including US base-hosting states): ~9 million people