Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

Iran vs Israel | Chronicles of a war foretold


What Happened

  • The US-Israel joint military strike on Iran on February 28, 2026 that killed Supreme Leader Khamenei did not emerge from nowhere — it was the culmination of decades of Iran-Israel confrontation that progressively escalated from covert operations to direct military exchanges.
  • The escalation arc began with decades of Iran-Israel proxy conflict (from 1985), moved through the April-October 2024 direct missile and drone exchanges, entered a full-scale war phase in June 2025 (Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, US joining with nuclear facility strikes on June 22, 2025), a brief ceasefire, and finally the February 2026 decapitation strike.
  • The conflict's evolution reflects core unresolved tensions: Iran's nuclear program, the existence of Israel as a state (which Iran's government has historically refused to recognise), and the US-Iran enmity dating from the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
  • The February 2026 strikes also had the explicit stated US objective of prompting "regime change" in Iran — a significant expansion of the stated war aim beyond mere nuclear degradation.

Static Topic Bridges

Iran-Israel Proxy Conflict — Four Decades of Shadow War

Iran and Israel have been engaged in an adversarial relationship since the 1979 Islamic Revolution overthrew the Shah — who had maintained close ties with Israel. Iran's government adopted a formal anti-Israel ideological stance (Ayatollah Khomeini: "Israel must be wiped from the page of time"). Over the following four decades, this conflict manifested primarily through proxy forces rather than direct military confrontation. Iran built and supported the "Axis of Resistance" — Hezbollah (Lebanon), Hamas (Gaza), Houthi/Ansar Allah (Yemen), and Shia militias in Iraq — as forward-deployed deterrents against Israel.

  • 1982: Israel invaded Lebanon; Hezbollah formed with direct IRGC support — the beginning of Iran's most capable proxy
  • 2006: Israel-Hezbollah War (Second Lebanon War); 33-day conflict; Hezbollah's survival seen as an Iranian deterrence success
  • October 7, 2023: Hamas attacks on Israel triggered the Gaza War; Hamas is an Iranian-backed organization; Iran denied direct operational involvement
  • April 1, 2024: Israel struck Iranian consulate complex in Damascus, killing senior IRGC commanders — first acknowledged direct Israeli attack on Iranian territory/premises
  • April 13-14, 2024: Iran responded with its first-ever direct strike on Israel — approximately 300 ballistic missiles and drones (most intercepted by Israel with US, UK, French, Jordanian support)
  • October 1-26, 2024: Second direct exchange — Iran launched missiles; Israel retaliated with strikes inside Iran

Connection to this news: The February 2026 US-Israel strike represents the logical endpoint of an escalation trajectory that had been building for decades but accelerated dramatically in 2024. The "chronicles of a war foretold" framing reflects how each step in this escalation made the next step more probable.

Iran's Nuclear Program — The Core Strategic Flashpoint

Iran's nuclear program has been the central strategic issue driving US and Israeli military planning against Iran. Iran began its civilian nuclear program under the Shah in the 1970s with US assistance. After the 1979 revolution, the program took on strategic dimensions. By 2021-2025, Iran had enriched uranium to 60% purity (weapons-grade is ~90%+), accumulated significant stockpiles, and the IAEA found Iran non-compliant with NPT safeguards for the first time since 2005 (June 2025).

  • NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty): signed 1968, entered into force 1970; 191 state parties; India, Pakistan, Israel are NOT parties; Iran IS a party
  • JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action): signed July 14, 2015 (Iran + P5+1 — US, UK, France, Russia, China + Germany); capped enrichment at 3.67%, stockpile at 300 kg
  • US withdrew from JCPOA: May 8, 2018 (Trump First Term); Iran progressively exceeded all JCPOA limits thereafter
  • Iran's enrichment level at 2025: 60% purity (far above 3.67% JCPOA limit; weapons-grade threshold ~90%)
  • June 22, 2025: US Air Force and Navy struck three Iranian nuclear facilities — Fordow (underground enrichment), Natanz (main enrichment plant), Isfahan (uranium conversion)
  • Iran officially ended JCPOA: October 2025
  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency): Vienna-based UN agency; NPT safeguards verification body; headquarters Vienna; India is IAEA member and subject to safeguards under India-specific Agreement (2008)

Connection to this news: The nuclear program was the stated primary justification for both the June 2025 and February 2026 US-Israel strikes. The "war foretold" narrative builds from Iran's progressive nuclear escalation as the structural driver of Israeli and US military intervention.

The Axis of Resistance — Iran's Regional Strategy and Its Collapse

The "Axis of Resistance" (Mehwar al-Muqawama) is the term used for the network of state and non-state actors aligned with Iran against Israel and US influence in the Middle East. It includes Hezbollah (Lebanon), Hamas (Gaza), Houthi/Ansar Allah (Yemen), Kataib Hezbollah and Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in Iraq, and Syrian government forces and Shia militias. This network was Iran's primary instrument of deterrence and power projection.

  • Hezbollah (Lebanon): Iran's most sophisticated proxy; estimated 100,000+ rockets pre-2024; destroyed to significant extent by Israel's 2024 Lebanon operations and post-October 7 campaigns; Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah killed by Israel in September 2024
  • Hamas (Gaza): politically weakened by Israel's post-October 7 military operations; most of Hamas's leadership killed (Ismail Haniyeh assassinated in Tehran in July 2024; Yahya Sinwar killed in Gaza in October 2024)
  • Houthi/Ansar Allah (Yemen): disrupted global shipping in Red Sea (2023-24); degraded by US-UK strikes; capacity reduced but not eliminated
  • Iraq PMF: Iraqi Shia militias allied with Iran; conducted attacks on US bases in Iraq and Syria
  • The systematic destruction of the Axis of Resistance's leadership and capabilities between 2024-2025 significantly weakened Iran's deterrence architecture before the February 2026 direct strikes

Connection to this news: The weakening of Iran's proxy network through Israel's military campaigns in Lebanon and Gaza (2024), combined with US-Israel strikes on nuclear facilities (June 2025), created the conditions for the February 2026 decapitation strike. Iran's deterrence capacity had been progressively degraded, making a direct strike on leadership more militarily and politically feasible.

International Law and the Legality of Preventive War

The legitimacy of US-Israel strikes on Iran under international law is highly contested. The UN Charter (Article 2(4)) prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. Exceptions include: (1) UN Security Council authorization (Chapter VII), and (2) individual or collective self-defence in response to an armed attack (Article 51). The US-Israel position — that Iran's nuclear program and its proxy attacks constituted a sufficient threat justifying preventive military action — is legally controversial and not accepted by most international law scholars.

  • UN Charter Article 2(4): prohibits threat or use of force against territorial integrity or political independence of any state
  • UN Charter Article 51: "inherent right of individual or collective self-defence" — applies to an armed attack that has occurred, not a potential future threat
  • Distinction: Preemptive force (responding to imminent, demonstrable attack) vs Preventive force (striking a potential future threat) — only preemptive force has any arguable legal basis under Article 51
  • UN Security Council: VETO-wielding permanent members (US, UK, France, Russia, China) — US vetoed UNSC resolutions condemning US-Israel strikes
  • India's position: India has historically supported peaceful resolution of the Iran nuclear issue; India abstained on contentious UNSC votes on Iran sanctions
  • International Court of Justice (ICJ): the principal judicial organ of the UN; cases involving state conduct in conflicts can be referred to ICJ (as Iran vs US over nuclear-related sanctions in 2018 — Certain Iranian Assets case)

Connection to this news: The legality of the US-Israel strikes on Iran — which killed a sitting head of state and hundreds of civilians — will be contested in international forums. India's response in UNSC, General Assembly, and other multilateral bodies will be shaped by its doctrine of strategic autonomy and support for international law.

Key Facts & Data

  • Iran-Hezbollah ties established: 1982 (Israel's Lebanon invasion triggered IRGC's creation of Hezbollah)
  • First direct Iran-Israel exchange: April 13-14, 2024 (Iran fired ~300 missiles and drones; most intercepted)
  • Second direct exchange: October 1-26, 2024
  • Hamas leader Haniyeh assassinated in Tehran: July 31, 2024
  • Hezbollah leader Nasrallah killed: September 2024 (Israeli airstrike in Beirut)
  • US-Israel nuclear facility strikes: June 22, 2025 (Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan)
  • Iran ended JCPOA: October 2025
  • IAEA found Iran non-compliant with NPT safeguards: June 12, 2025
  • February 2026 US-Israel strike: kills Khamenei, at least 200 people, 700+ wounded
  • NPT: signed 1968, entered into force 1970; 191 parties; India, Pakistan, Israel not party
  • JCPOA: signed July 14, 2015; US withdrew May 8, 2018 (Trump First Term)
  • Iran's uranium enrichment level (2025): 60% purity (JCPOA limit was 3.67%; weapons grade ~90%+)
  • UN Charter Article 2(4): prohibits force against territorial integrity; Article 51: right of self-defence after armed attack