Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

US seeks flexible pathway to include plurilateral pacts at WTO


What Happened

  • The WTO's 14th Ministerial Conference (MC14) is scheduled for March 26-29, 2026, in Yaoundé, Cameroon — the first time a WTO ministerial is hosted in sub-Saharan Africa.
  • The US has proposed a "flexible pathway" to incorporate plurilateral agreements into the WTO architecture, with benefits accruing only to consenting parties rather than extending to all members under the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) principle.
  • The US position, laid out in a December 2025 reform submission, advocates for "likeminded trading partners committed to fair and reciprocal trade" to advance agreements within WTO without requiring full consensus from all 166 members.
  • The US also called for a re-evaluation of the MFN principle and differentiation among developing countries for the purpose of special and differential treatment (SDT) — a move targeting India's use of SDT provisions.
  • India, along with several developing nations, has insisted on consensus-based decision-making, continuation of unconditional MFN, and preservation of SDT for developing countries — particularly on agriculture and food security.
  • India's specific concern is securing a permanent solution for its public stockholding (food subsidy) programmes, currently shielded only by the temporary Bali Peace Clause (2013).

Static Topic Bridges

WTO: Structure, Ministerial Conference, and Consensus Decision-Making

The World Trade Organisation (WTO) was established on January 1, 1995, replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, 1948), and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. It currently has 166 members. The Ministerial Conference is the WTO's highest decision-making body, meeting at least once every two years. WTO decisions are conventionally made by consensus — meaning no member formally objects — a rule that gives every member, including developing nations, an effective veto. The US proposal to allow plurilateral agreements (agreements among a subset of members) to be integrated into the WTO framework without extension to all members would dilute this consensus architecture.

  • WTO established: January 1, 1995; HQ: Geneva, Switzerland; Members: 166.
  • Ministerial Conference: Supreme body; meets biennially.
  • MC13 was held in Abu Dhabi (February 2024); MC14 in Yaoundé, Cameroon (March 2026).
  • Director-General: Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala (since 2021, first woman and first African DG).
  • Dispute Settlement Body (DSB): Adjudicates trade disputes; Appellate Body has been non-functional since 2019 due to US blocking of judge appointments.
  • Consensus rule: Decisions require no formal objection from any member — effectively a veto power.

Connection to this news: The US proposal to allow plurilateral pacts without extending benefits to all members (non-MFN basis) directly challenges the consensus-based, universal benefit model on which the WTO was founded — making India's pushback both a legal and a developmental position.


Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Principle: The Cornerstone of Multilateral Trade

The MFN principle, enshrined in Article I of GATT and Article II of GATS, requires WTO members to extend any trade advantage, favour, or privilege granted to one member immediately and unconditionally to all other members. It is a non-discrimination principle that prevents the WTO from being divided into exclusive trading clubs. Exceptions exist for Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and Customs Unions under GATT Article XXIV, for developing country preferences under the Enabling Clause (Generalised System of Preferences), and for national security under GATT Article XXI. The US proposal would add a new exception, allowing benefits under plurilateral pacts to be ring-fenced for consenting parties.

  • MFN principle: GATT Article I (goods), GATS Article II (services).
  • Exceptions: FTAs/Customs Unions (Article XXIV), GSP for developing countries (Enabling Clause), National Security (Article XXI).
  • Unconditional MFN means benefits cannot be made conditional on reciprocal concessions.
  • US position: Make plurilateral benefits available only to signatories (conditional, selective MFN).
  • India's position: Maintain unconditional MFN as a non-negotiable multilateral principle.

Connection to this news: The US's proposed conditional MFN within the WTO framework would allow trade deal benefits to flow only among willing partners, effectively creating a two-tier system within WTO — undermining India's ability to access markets without agreeing to terms it finds unfavourable.


Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) and India's Food Security Position

Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) provisions in WTO agreements recognise that developing countries need flexibility, longer transition periods, and exemptions from certain obligations to protect their developmental goals. India invokes SDT particularly on agriculture, relying on the Peace Clause agreed at the Bali Ministerial (2013) to protect its Minimum Support Price (MSP) and public food procurement programmes from WTO subsidy limits. WTO rules cap agricultural subsidies (Aggregate Measure of Support, AMS) at 10% of production value for developing countries, but India's subsidies to wheat and rice under PMGKAY and other schemes may breach this limit. A permanent solution to public stockholding for food security remains unresolved since Nairobi (2015) and Bali (2013).

  • WTO cap on agricultural subsidies: 10% of production value (de minimis) for developing countries.
  • Peace Clause (Bali, 2013): Temporary shield against WTO action on India's food procurement subsidies.
  • US has filed counter-notifications against India's rice and wheat subsidies at WTO.
  • India's demand: Permanent solution for public stockholding programmes linked to food security.
  • US proposal at MC14: Differentiate among developing countries for SDT eligibility — specifically targeting large economies like India.
  • India's IFD (Investment Facilitation for Development) opposition: India refuses to join this plurilateral agreement, arguing it was not negotiated under consensus.

Connection to this news: The US's call for SDT differentiation would strip India of the developing-country flexibilities it relies on for its food subsidy programmes — making India's insistence on maintaining SDT rights both an economic and food security imperative.


Key Facts & Data

  • WTO established: January 1, 1995; HQ: Geneva; Members: 166.
  • MC14 dates: March 26-29, 2026; Venue: Yaoundé, Cameroon.
  • WTO DG: Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala (since 2021).
  • Appellate Body: Non-functional since 2019 (US blocking new judge appointments).
  • MFN principle: GATT Article I — trade benefits must be extended to all members unconditionally.
  • WTO agricultural subsidy cap for developing countries: 10% of production value.
  • Bali Peace Clause (2013): Shields India's food procurement subsidies from WTO legal challenge temporarily.
  • India's food security schemes covered: PDS, MSP-based procurement, PMGKAY.
  • US December 2025 reform paper: Proposed non-MFN plurilateral pacts + SDT differentiation.
  • IFD Agreement: Plurilateral pact India opposes, signed by ~120 members.