Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

Parliamentary panel urges a 'golden share' strategy to protect PSU autonomy if state stakes fall below 51%

March 17, 2026 5 min read Economics Polity & Governance GS2 GS3
On This Page ▼

What Happened

  • A Parliamentary Standing Committee urged the government to finalize a "golden share" strategy to protect Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) autonomy when government stake falls below 51%.
  • The committee's recommendations align with the Economic Survey 2025–26's proposal to change the definition of "Government Company" under the Companies Act to allow effective control at as low as 26% equity.
  • The panel also recommended enhancing the MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) framework between PSUs and the government to improve accountability while preserving operational autonomy.
  • The committee advocated developing a roadmap for Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs) and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) as monetization tools for PSU assets without full ownership transfer.
  • The government is considering a golden share in strategic PSUs — granting veto powers over critical decisions regardless of equity holding — as it accelerates disinvestment while seeking to target ₹80,000 crore from Railway PSU stake sales by 2030.

Static Topic Bridges

A "golden share" is a special class of share held by the government that grants it veto power over certain corporate decisions — such as change of ownership, merger, disposal of key assets, or appointment of directors — irrespective of the government's actual equity holding. First popularised during the UK privatisations of the 1980s (companies like British Aerospace, Rolls-Royce, BAA), the concept allows the state to monetise equity while retaining strategic oversight. Internationally, Brazil holds a golden share in Embraer (aircraft manufacturer); the US federal government received a golden share in U.S. Steel following its 2025 acquisition by Nippon Steel.

  • Origin: UK privatisation wave of the 1980s under PM Margaret Thatcher
  • Legal form: Typically embedded in company Articles of Association; can also be through statute
  • Rights conferred: Veto over hostile takeovers, change of control, disposal of defence/strategic assets
  • Indian context: No formal legislative framework yet; requires amendment to Companies Act, 2013
  • Economic Survey 2025–26 recommendation: Redefine "Government Company" — reduce threshold from 51% to 26% for listed entities
  • UK note: European Court of Justice ruled UK's golden share in BAA illegal in 2003 (violates free circulation of capital within EU)

Connection to this news: The parliamentary panel's recommendation is for India to codify a golden share mechanism before government stakes fall below 51% in strategic PSUs through disinvestment, preventing loss of effective control.

PSU Disinvestment Policy: History and Current Framework

Disinvestment of Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) is managed through the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) under the Ministry of Finance. The policy distinguishes between minority disinvestment (below 49% stake sold), majority disinvestment (above 50% transferred, maintaining government control), and strategic disinvestment (full transfer to private sector). The 51% threshold matters legally because the Companies Act, 2013, Section 2(45) defines a "Government Company" as one where the government (Central or State) holds at least 51% paid-up share capital.

  • DIPAM (formerly DIVEST): Nodal body for disinvestment, manages government equity in CPSEs
  • Companies Act, 2013, Section 2(45): "Government Company" = minimum 51% central/state government equity
  • Strategic disinvestment: Full privatization (e.g., Air India sold to Tata Group, 2022)
  • Of 36 PSUs up for strategic sale since 2016, only 10 sold; 8 bought by other PSUs
  • Disinvestment receipts FY 2025–26: well short of budgeted targets historically
  • New model: OFS (Offer for Sale) of minority stakes to retain control while raising capital

Connection to this news: The parliamentary panel's concern is that as the government pursues disinvestment, strategic PSUs could lose government company status (below 51%) without adequate safeguards — hence the golden share proposal.

InvITs and REITs: Asset Monetization Without Ownership Transfer

Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs) and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) are regulated investment vehicles under SEBI that allow infrastructure/real estate asset owners to monetize assets by listing them on stock exchanges while retaining operational control. SEBI introduced InvIT regulations in 2014 and REIT regulations in 2014 (with the first REIT listed in 2019). The National Monetisation Pipeline (NMP) identified InvITs/REITs as a key channel for ₹6 lakh crore monetisation over 2021–2026.

  • InvIT: Trust that holds infrastructure assets (roads, power, gas pipelines, telecom towers); distributes 90% of net distributable cash flows to unit holders
  • REIT: Trust that holds commercial real estate; similar distribution mandate
  • SEBI InvIT Regulations: 2014 (amended multiple times); mandatory listing on recognised stock exchanges
  • National Monetisation Pipeline (NMP) 2021–26: ₹6 lakh crore target across roads (₹1.6 lakh cr), railways (₹1.52 lakh cr), power (₹85,000 cr), and others
  • NHAI InvIT: ₹8,011 crore raised in 2021; PowerGrid InvIT: ₹7,735 crore raised in 2021
  • Advantage over disinvestment: Revenue stream preserved, ownership/control can be retained by PSU/government

Connection to this news: The parliamentary panel's recommendation to develop an InvIT/REIT roadmap for PSUs is a structural alternative to outright stake sale — generating capital without triggering the 51% threshold concern.

MoU Framework for PSU Accountability

The MoU system between the government and CPSEs — introduced in 1987–88 based on the Arjun Sengupta Committee recommendation — provides a performance contract specifying financial and non-financial targets. Annual MoU ratings ("Excellent," "Very Good," "Good," etc.) feed into pay revisions and board accountability. The parliamentary panel's call to strengthen MoUs aims to preserve operational autonomy while ensuring accountability even as government equity dilutes.

  • MoU system introduced: 1987–88 (Arjun Sengupta Committee)
  • Administered by: Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) under Ministry of Finance
  • Ratings: Excellent → Very Good → Good → Fair → Poor (five-point scale)
  • Linkage: MoU ratings linked to board-level pay revisions and incentives
  • Problem cited by panel: MoU system weakened; many CPSEs file MoUs late or with unambitious targets

Connection to this news: Strengthening MoUs is the governance complement to the golden share mechanism — both aim to preserve strategic government objectives even as equity ownership dilutes.

Key Facts & Data

  • Economic Survey 2025–26: Recommends reducing "Government Company" threshold from 51% to 26% for listed entities
  • Companies Act, 2013, Section 2(45): Defines "Government Company" as minimum 51% government equity
  • National Monetisation Pipeline 2021–26: ₹6 lakh crore target; InvITs/REITs are key channels
  • NHAI InvIT raised: ₹8,011 crore (2021); PowerGrid InvIT raised: ₹7,735 crore (2021)
  • Strategic disinvestment since 2016: 36 PSUs targeted; only 10 sold; 8 bought by other PSUs
  • DIPAM: Nodal agency for disinvestment under Ministry of Finance
  • Golden share origin: UK privatisation (1980s); now used by Brazil (Embraer), US (U.S. Steel)