Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

Big change on cards to how fertiliser subsidy is transferred? What Agriculture Minister is proposing


What Happened

  • Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan publicly pitched for shifting India's annual Rs 1.7 lakh crore fertiliser subsidy from manufacturers to farmers' bank accounts via Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT).
  • Chouhan stated that farmers should be given the freedom to choose which fertilisers to buy and in what quantities, rather than being locked into subsidised products available at fair price shops.
  • Under the current system, a 50-kg bag of urea that costs Rs 2,400 to produce reaches farmers at Rs 265-270 due to the government absorbing the difference — but this subsidy flows to manufacturers, not farmers.
  • A government-constituted small group has been tasked with deliberating on the DBT-fertiliser modalities, signalling that a "national debate" is being initiated rather than immediate implementation.
  • The proposal is conceptually similar to DBT reforms already implemented in LPG (Pahal scheme) and food (PMGKAY-CBDC pilot) sectors.

Static Topic Bridges

India's Fertiliser Subsidy Architecture

India operates a dual-track fertiliser subsidy system: a fixed Maximum Retail Price (MRP) system for urea, and a Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) scheme for phosphatic and potassic (P&K) fertilisers. In both cases, subsidies currently flow to manufacturers and importers, who sell to farmers at controlled or subsidised prices; the government then reimburses the companies.

  • Urea (most used fertiliser): Price controlled by government; current MRP is approximately Rs 242/45-kg bag (heavily subsidised); manufacturers reimbursed by Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers
  • NBS Scheme (launched April 2010): Fixed subsidy per kg of nutrient (N, P, K, S) paid to manufacturers of 28 grades of P&K fertilisers; companies can price these at market rates above the subsidy baseline
  • DBT in fertilisers (since 2018): A partial DBT is already operational — the subsidy is released to manufacturers only after verified retail sales to farmers using their Aadhaar-linked Point of Sale (PoS) machines at retail outlets
  • Annual fertiliser subsidy: Approximately Rs 1.7-1.9 lakh crore (varies year to year based on international prices)
  • Nodal Ministry: Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers

Connection to this news: The 2018 DBT system is a halfway measure — the subsidy is verified against actual farmer purchases but still reaches the farmer's pocket as lower prices rather than cash. Chouhan's proposal would complete the DBT transition by crediting cash directly to farmers' bank accounts.

Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) — Framework and Precedents

DBT is a reform mechanism that routes government scheme benefits directly to the bank accounts of intended beneficiaries, eliminating intermediaries and reducing leakage. DBT was launched as a mission in 2013 and has since been expanded to over 300 central government schemes.

  • Pahal scheme (LPG DBT): Launched 2014-15; LPG subsidy transferred directly to consumers' bank accounts; most successful DBT implementation — saved over Rs 59,000 crore (estimated) by eliminating bogus connections
  • JAM Trinity: Jan Dhan (bank accounts) + Aadhaar (biometric ID) + Mobile (for OTP) — the technology backbone of DBT
  • Concerns with fertiliser DBT: Farmers may lack banking access or digital literacy; transition may cause supply disruptions; open market purchase may lead to imbalanced fertiliser use (over-use of urea)
  • Diversion problem: Current system allows subsidised fertilisers to be diverted to non-agricultural uses (industrial, smuggling to neighbouring countries); DBT would eliminate this by tying subsidy to verified farmer identity

Connection to this news: Chouhan's proposal would apply the Pahal model to fertilisers — the largest remaining farm subsidy where DBT has not been fully implemented in cash terms.

PM PRANAM and Fertiliser Reform Context

The government has also introduced PM PRANAM (Pradhan Mantri Programme for Restoration, Awareness, Nourishment and Amelioration of Mother Earth) to incentivise states to reduce chemical fertiliser use by offering savings-linked grants. This operates alongside the Soil Health Card scheme, which guides farmers on balanced fertiliser use.

  • PM PRANAM: Any state that reduces chemical fertiliser consumption below a baseline gets 50% of the subsidy savings as a grant; designed to encourage shift to organic/bio-fertilisers
  • Soil Health Card: Recommends fertiliser dosage based on soil testing; over 22 crore cards distributed
  • Nano Urea: Promoted by IFFCO as a liquid alternative to bag urea; claimed to reduce urea consumption significantly
  • Neem-coated Urea mandate: Mandatory since 2015 to reduce diversion of urea to non-agricultural uses (neem coating makes it unsuitable for industrial processes)

Connection to this news: Fertiliser DBT reform is part of a broader pivot — from subsidising chemical fertilisers broadly to ensuring only genuine farming beneficiaries receive support while nudging towards sustainable fertiliser practices.

Key Facts & Data

  • Annual fertiliser subsidy: approximately Rs 1.7-1.9 lakh crore
  • Urea MRP: Rs 242/45-kg bag (vs production cost ~Rs 2,400/50 kg)
  • NBS Scheme launch year: April 2010
  • DBT in fertiliser sales (retailer verification): Implemented since 2018
  • LPG DBT (Pahal) estimated savings: Rs 59,000+ crore via elimination of bogus connections
  • Total DBT schemes (central government): 300+
  • JAM Trinity components: Jan Dhan accounts, Aadhaar, Mobile
  • Nodal ministry for fertiliser subsidy: Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers