Current Affairs Topics Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

Trump’s steep tariffs are straining India’s textile sector. Does the Budget address this?


What Happened

  • US President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs — which hit India's textile sector with rates as high as 50% through 2025 — severely strained India's garment export competitiveness, particularly against Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Pakistan.
  • An interim US–India deal (February 6, 2026) reduced India's tariff rate to 18%, marginally below Bangladesh's 19% and Vietnam's 20%.
  • However, a critical provision in a US–Bangladesh trade deal signed on February 9, 2026, granted zero-tariff access to Bangladeshi textiles made with US-origin cotton and man-made fibres — a clause that effectively wiped out India's narrow tariff advantage overnight.
  • India's textile sector is the second-largest employer after agriculture, supporting over 45 million direct jobs — making tariff competitiveness a matter of both trade policy and social security.
  • Budget 2026-27 offered limited direct relief: customs duty rationalisation on inputs and selective PLI benefits, without specifically addressing the Bangladesh zero-tariff provision.

What Happened

  • US tariff on Indian textiles was 50% (2025) under IEEPA reciprocal tariff regime.
  • India–US interim deal (February 6, 2026) cut India's rate to 18%.
  • US–Bangladesh deal (February 9, 2026): Bangladesh textiles using US cotton/man-made fibre = 0% tariff.
  • India's 18% vs. Bangladesh's effective 0% on US-cotton-based garments: a 18-percentage-point gap for roughly three-quarters of Bangladesh's USD 7.3 billion annual US garment trade.
  • Budget 2026 response: Customs duty cuts on textile inputs, PLI extension, but no direct counter to the Bangladesh zero-tariff clause.

Static Topic Bridges

India's Textile Industry: Structure and Global Competitiveness

India is the world's second-largest textile producer (after China) and sixth-largest exporter of textiles and apparel. The sector contributes ~2.3% of GDP, ~13% of industrial production, and ~12% of merchandise export earnings. India's competitive strengths lie in cotton yarn, natural fibres, and technical textiles. Weaknesses include fragmented manufacturing (large MSME base), higher labour costs than Bangladesh, and lower compliance with synthetic-fibre standards demanded by fast fashion buyers.

  • India's textile exports: ~USD 35 billion (2024–25)
  • Employment: 45 million direct + 100 million indirect
  • India's US textile exports: ~USD 9–10 billion annually
  • Bangladesh's US garment exports: ~USD 7.3 billion annually; ~75% cotton-based
  • Key competitors in US market: Bangladesh, Vietnam, China, Pakistan, Cambodia
  • India's strength: Cotton yarn, linen, silk, technical textiles, home furnishings
  • India's weakness: Synthetic textiles (polyester apparel) — dominated by China, Vietnam

Connection to this news: The US–Bangladesh zero-tariff clause directly targets cotton-based garments — India's supposed stronghold in the US textile market — threatening to redirect orders from Indian exporters to Bangladeshi manufacturers using American cotton.

WTO Rules, Trade Deals, and the MFN Principle

Under WTO's Most Favoured Nation (MFN) principle (GATT Article I), trade concessions extended to one country must generally be extended to all WTO members. However, Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and bilateral Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) are exempted under GATT Article XXIV, provided they cover "substantially all trade." The US–Bangladesh zero-tariff provision — conditional on use of US-origin cotton — is a rules-of-origin-based trade preference, a standard FTA tool. India's challenge is that it cannot demand equivalent treatment as a matter of WTO law; it must negotiate its own deal.

  • WTO MFN principle: GATT Article I — non-discrimination obligation
  • FTA exemption: GATT Article XXIV — permitted if covering substantially all trade
  • Rules of Origin: Conditions determining which country's goods qualify for preferential tariffs
  • US-Bangladesh provision: Zero tariff for garments using US-origin cotton/man-made fibre (rules of origin-based)
  • India's MFN applied tariff on US goods: ~12% average (creates asymmetry in negotiations)
  • India–US no FTA: Currently only an interim/phase-1 trade deal framework

Connection to this news: India cannot leverage WTO rules to match the Bangladesh zero-tariff deal — it must negotiate directly with the US for equivalent provisions, which requires India to offer further market access concessions in return, creating a trade-off between textile sector interests and other sectors.

PLI Scheme for Textiles and Sector-Specific Budget Support

The Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for textiles, launched in 2021 with a ₹10,683 crore outlay over five years, targets man-made fibre (MMF) fabrics and technical textiles — two segments where India is weak globally. Apparel, which drives most of India's US textile exports, was excluded from the PLI. Budget 2026 extended PLI benefits for technical textiles and rationalised duties on synthetic fibre inputs, but did not specifically create an equivalent to Bangladesh's zero-tariff cotton clause.

  • PLI Textiles: ₹10,683 crore; focuses on MMF fabrics and technical textiles (10 product segments)
  • Excluded from PLI: Apparel (garments) — the export-heavy segment
  • Amended Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (ATUFS): Supports technology upgrades for textile machinery
  • Budget 2026 textile measures: Input duty reduction on synthetic fibres, PLI extension
  • AEPC (Apparel Export Promotion Council): Key industry body for garment exporters
  • Industry ask (unmet): Zero tariff access for US-bound garments using American cotton — matching Bangladesh

Connection to this news: The Budget's textile measures address structural competitiveness over the medium term but do not directly neutralise the short-term threat posed by Bangladesh's zero-tariff cotton clause, which industry bodies warn could redirect USD 2–3 billion in annual US apparel orders away from India within 12–18 months.

Key Facts & Data

  • India's textile exports: ~USD 35 billion (2024–25); US is top destination
  • India's US tariff (post-deal): 18% (down from 50% under IEEPA regime)
  • Bangladesh's US tariff: 19% standard; 0% for cotton/MMF garments using US-origin fibre
  • US–Bangladesh deal signed: February 9, 2026 (3 days after India–US deal)
  • Bangladesh's US garment trade: ~USD 7.3 billion/year; ~75% cotton-based
  • India's textile employment: 45 million direct, ~100 million indirect
  • PLI Textiles scheme: ₹10,683 crore; targets MMF and technical textiles (not apparel)
  • India's average MFN tariff: ~12% (creates negotiating asymmetry with US)
  • Budget 2026 textile measures: Input duty reduction, PLI extension, no garment-specific zero-tariff deal