Current Affairs Topics Quiz Archive
International Relations Economics Polity & Governance Environment & Ecology Science & Technology Internal Security Geography Social Issues Art & Culture Modern History

Women’s reservation Bill rushed by govt. to sidestep caste count, says Akhilesh

April 14, 2026 4 min read Polity & Governance Social Issues GS Paper 2 (Polity & Governance Social Justice)
On This Page ▼

What Happened

  • Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav accused the Union government of rushing the Women's Reservation Bill implementation without including caste data from the upcoming Census
  • He alleged that delimitation based on the 2011 Census (instead of post-2027 Census data that would include caste count) amounts to gerrymandering ahead of the 2029 Lok Sabha election
  • He questioned why delimitation would proceed without the "latest Census data" when the government has agreed to conduct a caste count as part of the 2027 Census
  • The core allegation: fast-tracking delimitation now would freeze constituency boundaries before OBC and caste-based demographic data can be incorporated, denying OBC women a dedicated sub-quota

Static Topic Bridges

The Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023 — Women's Reservation

The Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023, commonly called the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, reserves one-third of all seats for women in the Lok Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies, and the Delhi Assembly, including within SC and ST quotas. The Act also provides for a sub-reservation for SC and ST women within the women's quota. Crucially, the Act did not provide a sub-quota for OBC women, which remains a major demand of parties representing backward class communities.

  • Passed: Lok Sabha (454-2) and Rajya Sabha (214-0) on September 20–21, 2023
  • Implementation trigger: The reservation was linked to delimitation conducted after a fresh Census — the 2026 Bills delink this by allowing delimitation on 2011 Census data
  • Duration: 15 years (extendable by Parliament)
  • Rotation: Reserved constituencies to be rotated after each delimitation cycle
  • No OBC sub-quota: A significant political gap exploited by opposition parties

Connection to this news: Akhilesh Yadav's criticism targets precisely this legislative gap — the absence of OBC sub-quota and the use of 2011 Census data (which lacks caste disaggregation beyond SC/ST) for delimitation.

Delimitation and Its Constitutional Basis

Delimitation is the process of redrawing boundaries of parliamentary and assembly constituencies to reflect population changes, as mandated by Article 82 (Lok Sabha) and Article 170 (State Assemblies) of the Constitution. A Delimitation Commission is typically constituted by Parliament after each Census. The last comprehensive delimitation for Lok Sabha seats used the 1971 Census and froze seat numbers, which the proposed Constitutional 131st Amendment Bill, 2026, now seeks to change.

  • The 42nd Amendment (1976) froze seat numbers based on the 1971 Census until after the first Census post-2001
  • The 84th Amendment (2001) extended the freeze until after the first Census post-2026
  • The proposed 131st Amendment removes the freeze by allowing delimitation based on "such Census as Parliament may by law determine" — likely the 2011 Census
  • Delimitation Commission: Headed by a Supreme Court judge; includes the Chief Election Commissioner and State Election Commissioners; its orders have the force of law and are not challengeable in court

Connection to this news: The controversy is about which Census data is used. Critics argue using 2011 data (without caste information) benefits northern states (higher population) and disadvantages OBC representation, while the government argues the 2031 Census would delay women's reservation by nearly a decade.

Census 2027 and the Caste Count Debate

India's decennial Census was delayed from 2021 due to COVID-19 and related administrative challenges; it is now expected to be conducted in 2027. The government announced it would include a caste-based enumeration (socio-economic caste census / "caste count") as part of this Census — a major political concession following pressure from opposition parties and state-level OBC movements. The data collected in the caste count would enable caste-proportional representation claims.

  • India's last comprehensive caste census was conducted in 1931; the Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC) 2011 collected data but its full caste-wise results were not officially published
  • The demand for OBC sub-quota within women's reservation cannot be operationalised without authoritative caste population data
  • Bihar and Telangana conducted state-level caste surveys in 2023; their results showed OBCs constituting ~63% and ~46% of respective state populations
  • Delimitation before caste data publication would lock in constituency shapes without factoring caste demography

Connection to this news: The SP's critique is that proceeding with delimitation on pre-caste-count data is politically motivated — ensuring that OBC-dominant constituencies are not carved out in a way that compels OBC-specific reservation for women.

Key Facts & Data

  • Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023: 33% reservation for women in Lok Sabha, State Assemblies
  • No OBC sub-quota provided in the 2023 Act
  • Proposed 131st Amendment Bill, 2026: Increases Lok Sabha from 543 to 850 seats; uses 2011 Census for delimitation
  • Census 2027: Expected to include caste-based enumeration
  • Last comprehensive caste census: 1931
  • Delimitation Commission: Headed by a Supreme Court judge; orders not challengeable in court
  • Key Article: Article 82 (Lok Sabha seat readjustment), Article 170 (State Assembly readjustment)
  • 2029 Lok Sabha election: Next general election when women's reservation, if implemented, would first apply