CivilsWisdom.
Updated · Today
International Relations May 25, 2026 7 min read Daily brief · #8 of 24

Iran says charging fees for 'navigational services' in Hormuz

Iran's foreign ministry stated that it is collecting fees for "navigational services" on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, explicitly distinguishing t...


What Happened

  • Iran's foreign ministry stated that it is collecting fees for "navigational services" on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, explicitly distinguishing this from "tolls" while asserting that navigation assistance and environmental protection measures justify service charges.
  • Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman stated "We do not charge tolls," while framing the fees as compensation for services rendered, including navigation assistance and environmental protection.
  • Iran published a map claiming regulatory control over a stretch of the Strait of Hormuz that extends deep into the territorial waters of the United Arab Emirates and Oman, prompting five Gulf states to formally warn shipping companies through the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) not to comply with Iran's directives.
  • Reports indicate some vessels have paid up to $2 million per passage, with transactions reportedly conducted in Chinese yuan, suggesting a deliberate move to bypass dollar-denominated maritime fee systems.
  • The development comes amid a broader geopolitical context of escalating US-Iran tensions, with active US-Iran nuclear negotiations in progress in 2026.
  • International maritime law experts and affected states argue the fees violate the right of transit passage under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), specifically Articles 38 and 44.
  • Iran has not ratified UNCLOS, which it uses to dispute the applicability of transit passage rights, creating a legally contested environment with no straightforward enforcement pathway.

Static Topic Bridges

UNCLOS and the Right of Transit Passage (Articles 37–44)

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), adopted in 1982 and entering into force on November 16, 1994, is the foundational international legal framework governing all uses of the oceans. Part III (Articles 34–45) of UNCLOS specifically governs straits used for international navigation. Article 37 defines the scope: straits between one part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and another part of the high seas or EEZ. Article 38 establishes the right of transit passage — the freedom of navigation and overflight through such straits for continuous and expeditious transit — applicable to all ships and aircraft regardless of flag or type. Article 44 explicitly bars bordering states from hampering, suspending, or imposing charges merely for transit passage.

  • UNCLOS adopted: December 10, 1982 (Montego Bay, Jamaica); entered into force: November 16, 1994
  • India ratified UNCLOS: June 29, 1995
  • Iran: has NOT ratified UNCLOS; relies on 1958 Geneva Conventions and bilateral agreements
  • Article 38(1): all ships and aircraft enjoy the right of transit passage in straits used for international navigation
  • Article 38(2): transit passage shall not be impeded; the right shall not be suspended
  • Article 44: states bordering straits shall not hamper transit passage and shall give appropriate publicity to any danger within or over the strait
  • Article 26: specifically prohibits coastal states from levying charges on foreign ships merely for passage through the territorial sea
  • The UNCLOS regime upgraded navigation rights in international straits from the prior "innocent passage" standard (which could be suspended) to "transit passage" (which cannot be suspended)

Connection to this news: Iran's framing of fees as "navigational services" rather than "tolls" is a deliberate legal hedge — attempting to circumvent Article 44's prohibition on charges for mere passage by characterising the fees as voluntary service payments. International legal consensus rejects this distinction.

The Strait of Hormuz: Strategic Geography

The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical maritime chokepoint for energy trade. Located between Iran to the north and Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south, it connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. The strait is approximately 167 km long, with its narrowest navigable width around 34–39 km (21 nautical miles). The two designated shipping lanes — each approximately 3.2 km (2 miles) wide — are separated by a 3.2 km buffer zone. In 2024, an average of approximately 20 million barrels per day of oil (equivalent to about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption) transited the strait, representing over one-quarter of total global seaborne oil trade. Approximately one-fifth of global LNG trade also transits Hormuz, primarily from Qatar.

  • Location: between Iran (north) and Oman/UAE (south); connects Persian Gulf to Gulf of Oman/Arabian Sea
  • Length: approximately 167 km; minimum navigable width: approximately 33–34 km
  • Oil flow (2024): approximately 20 million barrels per day — roughly 20% of global petroleum consumption
  • LNG flow: approximately one-fifth of global LNG trade (2024)
  • Primary oil exporters through Hormuz: Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iraq, Kuwait, Iran, Qatar
  • Iran's territorial sea claim: Iran and Oman each claim territorial seas extending into the strait; the two lanes fall within claimed territorial waters

Connection to this news: Iran's control over the northern shore gives it physical leverage over the strait even without legal authority to impose charges. The fee demands — up to $2 million per passage — would impose enormous costs on global energy supply chains if systematically enforced and complied with.

Iran has not ratified UNCLOS and instead relies on earlier customary international law, the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, and bilateral agreements. Iran claims the strait falls partly within its territorial waters (12 nautical miles from its coast) and argues it is entitled to regulate activities therein. Under customary international law, even prior to UNCLOS, transit through international straits was governed by the right of "innocent passage" — a weaker standard that permitted suspension. Iran argues it retains sovereign regulatory authority, including service fee imposition, within its territorial sea.

  • 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea: pre-UNCLOS framework; allowed suspension of innocent passage through territorial seas in some circumstances
  • Iran signed the 1958 Convention but its position on the subsequent UNCLOS regime is one of non-ratification
  • Five Gulf states (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait) issued formal warnings through IMO in 2026 not to comply with Iran's directives
  • IMO: established under the Convention on the International Maritime Organization (1948); the UN's specialised agency for maritime affairs
  • Payments reportedly in Chinese yuan: consistent with Iran's strategy to operate outside dollar-denominated international systems subject to US sanctions

Connection to this news: Iran's non-UNCLOS status is the legal fulcrum of the entire dispute. Without UNCLOS's binding obligations on Iran, affected states must rely on diplomatic pressure, IMO resolutions, and naval deterrence — none of which provide a quick enforcement remedy.

India's Exposure: Hormuz and Energy Security

India is the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil and imports approximately 87% of its consumption. Over 60% of India's crude oil imports historically came from Persian Gulf countries (Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE), with a significant portion transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Following the outbreak of the West Asia conflict in February 2026, India has increased non-Hormuz sourcing to approximately 70% of crude imports (up from 55%), reflecting an active diversification drive. Any sustained closure or fee imposition on Hormuz would directly affect India's energy import costs and supply security.

  • India's crude oil import dependence: approximately 87% of consumption imported
  • Gulf/West Asia share: historically over 60% of crude imports from Gulf states
  • Post-February 2026: India increased non-Hormuz sourcing to ~70% of crude imports
  • India's crude oil import bill: one of the largest contributors to the current account deficit
  • India ratified UNCLOS in 1995 and is a strong advocate of freedom of navigation and the UNCLOS framework

Connection to this news: India's status as a major Hormuz-dependent energy importer means Iran's fee regime directly threatens India's import economics. The simultaneous Rubio-Modi dialogue on US energy diversification (May 23, 2026) reflects India's recognition that reducing Hormuz exposure is now a strategic imperative.

Key Facts & Data

  • Strait of Hormuz oil flow (2024): approximately 20 million barrels/day — ~20% of global petroleum consumption
  • Strait of Hormuz LNG share: approximately one-fifth of global LNG trade (2024)
  • Strait minimum navigable width: approximately 21 nautical miles (two 2-mile lanes, 2-mile buffer)
  • Reported vessel transit fees: up to $2 million per passage
  • Payments reportedly conducted in Chinese yuan
  • Five Gulf states issued formal IMO warnings against compliance with Iran's directives (2026)
  • UNCLOS adoption: December 10, 1982; entry into force: November 16, 1994
  • Iran: has NOT ratified UNCLOS
  • India ratified UNCLOS: June 29, 1995
  • UNCLOS Article 38: right of transit passage through international straits — cannot be impeded or suspended
  • UNCLOS Article 44: no charges may be levied on vessels exercising transit passage
On this page
  1. What Happened
  2. Static Topic Bridges
  3. UNCLOS and the Right of Transit Passage (Articles 37–44)
  4. The Strait of Hormuz: Strategic Geography
  5. Iran's Legal Position and the Non-UNCLOS Framework
  6. India's Exposure: Hormuz and Energy Security
  7. Key Facts & Data
Display